The Xometry app works best with JavaScript enabled!
Xometry Logo
CapabilitiesIndustriesResourcesSuppliesBecome a Partner
Sign In
Cookie Policy
Xometry stores cookies on your computer to provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media. By using this website, you consent to the cookies we use and our Privacy Policy.
Blog3D Printing

5 Easy Ways to Reduce 3D Printing Costs

There are a handful of considerations to keep in mind when selecting 3D printing as your custom manufacturing process.

By Greg Paulsen
 5 min read
SIMILAR STORIES
How to Ease Cash Flow Anxiety With the Xometry Advance Card
September 17, 2020
 3 min read

Xometry’s 3D printing service offers 7 unique processes and dozens of industrial-grade materials to tackle any job. To reduce the costs of 3D printing parts (without sacrificing speed and quality), product designers and engineers should understand where the major cost drivers are and how to mitigate them.

The two main cost drivers across all additive platforms are machine time and material cost. Machine time includes the time to fuse or join material to make the part as well as the time it takes the machine to warm up, transition to a new layer, and post-process before shipping. Material costs are directly associated with the material used when printing as well as any wasted and unusable material associated with the direct print.

The 5 tips outlined below are suggestions to help you save money when you get an instant online quote from Xometry.

Tip #1: Decrease Part Volume

Materials used in 3D printing processes, such as nylon powder (SLS) or rolls of thermoplastic filament (FDM) are a main cost factor. Thankfully, additive manufacturing processes are very efficient because printers can either recycle some unused material (e.g. non-melted nylon powder that acts as support structure in SLS) or produce minimal waste material (e.g. FDM cartridges that only extrude enough filament to make the part and support structure).

Xometry’s quoting algorithm automatically detects how much material is needed to produce your CAD file, so finding ways to reduce the volume of your part is a great way to bring down the price.

One way to limit volume, but still preserve overall dimensions, is lightweighting. Creating pockets in designs will reduce material usage, making it more cost-effective to build. When creating a pocket, be sure to create an exit hole for un-sintered (SLS and DMLS) or support (PolyJet) material removal.

For FDM printing, changing the infill is a great way to reduce to reduce part volume and cost. Xometry offers three different infill patterns for FDM:

  • Ultralight: Xometry’s ultralight infill parts are filled with a single zig-zag pattern. This is the lightest and least expensive infill option.
  • Light: Xometry’s light infill parts are filled with a double cross-hatch pattern. This option provides increased rigidity and is lighter than a complete solid infill.
  • Solid: Xometry’s solid infill parts are completely filled for the highest density. This is the heaviest and most expensive option.

To learn more about infills and see visual comparisons of each, check out our infills article!

Slide 1 of 2

A double cross-hatch pattern provides increased rigidity while retaining part strength

Tip #2: Reduce Z-height

3D printers produce parts on a layer-by-layer basis, fusing or bonding one cross-section at a time until the whole object is formed. For powder bed fusion processes, such as SLS, HP Multi Jet Fusion, and DMLS, the machines melt layers of powder and then moves incrementally up to create the next level. For extruding/jetting processes, the material is ejected through a printhead nozzle. SLA and DLS processes balance layers and cure times. For every layer, which varies from 0.001”–0.013” in height depending on the process, there is a mechanical movement which can add a lot of time to a part’s build. Pairing the vertical movement, recoating of material layers, and even incremental automated printhead cleaning can add hours of machine time.

Minimizing the vertical Z-height of the part is a great way to keep printing costs down. Sometimes splitting parts is also more economical than increasing height. With a lower part height, the impact of the machine activity between layers is mitigated and the costs are focused more on direct material costs.

Xometry’s SLS, HP Multi Jet Fusion, FDM, SLA, DLS, PolyJet, and DMLS processes all use printers with various maximum build platform sizes. These are integrated into our AI-based quoting algorithms, which means that parts that can be built lying on their side (horizontally) tend to be more cost-effective than those that have to be built with their longest face in the vertical direction.

Here are some good “best practices’ lengths to keep in mind when designing your part for a particular process. Staying under these will generally ensure a lower-priced part. Another way to think about it is that if you stay under half the available platform size then you can get multiple parts on the build, allowing some overhead costs to be shared.

Z-height Limits By 3D Printing Process
ProcessRecommended Z-height Limits
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) UnfilledUnder 13” preferred, with build area up to 13" x 13" x 20"
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) Glass-filledUnder 15” preferred, with build area up to 26" x 15" x 23"
HP Multi Jet Fusion (HP MJF)Under 11” preferred, with build area up to 15" x 11" x 15"
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)Under 16” preferred, with build area up to 36" x 24" x 36"
Stereolithography (SLA)Under 16” preferred, with build area up to 29" x 25" x 21"
Carbon DLSUnder 3” preferred, with build area up to 7.4" x 4.6" x 12.8"
PolyJetUnder 7” preferred, with build area up to 19" x 15" x 7"
Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS)Under 5” preferred, with build area up to 9" x 9" x 9"

Tip #3: Choose the Right Process

Different 3D printing processes have distinct price points, which means choosing the processes that fall within your budget (without compromising part function) can help you minimize costs.

Xometry’s SLS or HP Multi Jet Fusion printing processes using Nylon 12 is nearly always the most cost-effective process to make plastic parts in bulk. This is mostly driven by the fact that SLS parts can be printed in a family build which allows many items to be made “free-floating” in the powder bed. This allows for quantity discounts to be applied to additional items of the same part as well as added unique parts in the same quote. For large flat parts, FDM ABS-M30 or ASA is the go-to process due to the platform’s capacity to build parts quickly with various materials, infill, and color options.

Our most cost-effective process for 3D printing metals is DMLS, specifically with Aluminum material. Complex parts can be created accurately without tooling, which reduces manufacturing lead times from months to days. We also recommend DMLS as an economical choice for a powerful alternative to metal casting in low volumes.

See this infographic to help you choose the right 3D printing option for your project.
Slide 1 of 1

A bearing housing printed in two different materials. On left, PolyJet Clear, on right, DMLS Stainless Steel.

For more in-depth tips, watch this on-demand webinar, Selecting the Right 3D Printing Material, hosted by me, Greg Paulsen, Director of Application Engineering at Xometry.

It's about why materials matter and how to choose materials that meet your project goals and maximize cost efficiency. I also discuss the strengths and trade-offs of each additive manufacturing process at Xometry and real-life application examples.

Greg Paulsen
They call me the Director of Application Engineering at Xometry. This means I not only get to produce great design-for-manufacturing content, but also consult on a variety of custom manufacturing projects using CNC machining, additive manufacturing, sheet metal, urethane casting, and injection molding. If you have a question, I'm your guy.

Quick Links

  • Careers

  • Contact Us

  • Help Center

  • Legal

  • Our Story

  • Press

  • Xometry Go Green

Locations

  • 7940 Cessna Avenue
    Gaithersburg, MD 20879
    240-252-1138


  • 7315 Wisconsin Ave
    Suite 300 East
    Bethesda, MD 20814


  • 446 East High Street
    Lexington, KY 40507


  • 800 Winchester Rd
    Lexington, KY 40505


  • 11777 San Vicente Blvd
    Suite 747
    Los Angeles, CA 90049


  • 117 Wright Industrial Cove
    Jackson, TN 38301


  • Ada-Lovelace-Str. 9
    85521 Ottobrunn, Germany
    +49 32 22 109 8186

Xometry Go Green Initiative
1.0M+
LBS OF C02 OFFSET

Xometry
© 2020 Xometry, All Rights Reserved