The Xometry app works best with JavaScript enabled!
  • Solutions
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • Enterprise
  • How Xometry Works
  • Become a Supplier
ResourcesInjection MoldingBlow Molding vs. Rotational Molding: What’s the Difference?

Blow Molding vs. Rotational Molding: What’s the Difference?

picture of Kat de Naoum
Written by
Rebecca Piccoli headshot
Updated by
 4 min read
Published September 12, 2022
Updated November 25, 2024

Learn which technique produces 70 parts an hour (and which can only make two…)

PET bottles being produced in a blow molding machine. Image Credit: MOLPIX/Shutterstock.com

As a manufacturing technique, molding has been around for thousands of years. Two of the oldest molding processes that are still used today are blow molding and rotational molding. In this article (and the video below), we explain them in more detail and cover how they differ and what they each do best.

What is Blow Molding?

Blow molding is a plastic hollow-part forming process used to make products with simpler designs and thin walls. It’s an ancient technique that first emerged in the form of glassblowing around 1700 BCE in Syria. Later refinements allowed glassblowers to create bottles. The more modern blow molding process matured in the 1930s when the first automatic blow molding machine was introduced by the Plax Corporation. 

Most modern blow molding deals with thermoplastics. The procedure, shown in the diagram below, involves a hollow plastic parison (also known as a preform) being placed at the mouth of a mold cavity and heated until properly malleable. Pressurized gas is then forced into the parison’s open end until it expands to match the mold cavity’s shape. The product then gets cooled and crystalized so it doesn’t deform while being removed from the mold.

blow molding process
Blow molding process

This method is ideal for large-scale production thanks to how quickly it can make parts—70 of them in just an hour. It can make thin, lightweight parts with parting line integrity (no visible hems or seams from the mold), and you can control the wall thickness. Though this fully automated approach is best known for soda and water bottles, it also finds uses in engineered gas tanks and electrical enclosures. 

It’s preferred over rotational molding for its cost-efficiency in high-output industrial settings, especially at rates higher than 3,000 units per year. Further adding to its cost-efficiency is the mold itself, which lasts a very long time. Having said that, the tooling cost is quite high, and low-volume production quantities work out more expensive. As far as aesthetics, this isn’t typically the method you’d want to use if you need parts with super attractive finishes.

What is Rotational Molding?

Also known as rotomolding, rotational molding is a high-heat, low-pressure thermoforming process used to make hollow plastic parts. A type of rotational molding was used in ancient Egypt to make ceramics, but an upgraded version was introduced in the U.S. around 1945 for plastics. This wasn’t met with open arms, though, due to its snail-like pace. The plastic powders have since had several upgrades so that they flow more easily and evenly, making the process today much faster (thankfully).

How the rotational molding process works
How the rotational molding process works

In the process, which you can see in the above picture, a hollow mold is filled with powdered plastic resin and spun before being transferred to an oven, where the resin melts and coats the mold’s walls. The mold keeps on spinning until the resin cools and hardens into the final desired shape. The mold can then be opened so you can take the part out. 

It can make large parts with double walls and an open design, and not much secondary processing is necessary because it doesn’t have any weld lines or seams (as opposed to blow molding). There’s cheaper tooling due to the low pressures involved, and it’s more efficient at lower production volumes of less than 3,000 pieces a year—great for startups and small businesses.

With rotational molding, you get a lot more versatility, design flexibility, and stronger products that are much more durable than those made with blow molding. Rotomolded parts do, however, have thicker walls which uses more material and makes them heavier, and the final product could also end up with voids. This method is pretty labor-intensive, and doesn’t offer good control over the thickness of the walls. The tools also need regular maintenance or replacement.

Comparing Blow Molding and Rotational Molding

The table below offers a side-by-side view of these two manufacturing methods so you can determine which one will be better for your production needs.

AttributeBlow MoldingRotational Molding
Attribute
Versatility
Blow Molding
Low
Rotational Molding
High
Attribute
Design flexibility
Blow Molding
Low
Rotational Molding
High
Attribute
Cycle time
Blow Molding
Fast, less than a minute
Rotational Molding
Slower, 30 minutes or more
Attribute
Production rate
Blow Molding
70 parts per hour
Rotational Molding
2 parts per hour
Attribute
Part weight
Blow Molding
Light (0.1–5 pounds)
Rotational Molding
Heavy (varies could be 50 pounds or more)
Attribute
Part size
Blow Molding
Medium to small (around 1–5 gallons)
Rotational Molding
Small to very large (can reach 20–300 gallons, sometimes more)
Attribute
Part porosity
Blow Molding
Low
Rotational Molding
High
Attribute
Shape complexity
Blow Molding
Limited to simple shapes without undercuts
Rotational Molding
High, can make intricate, hollow shapes, multi-compartment designs, and undercuts
Attribute
Wall thickness control
Blow Molding
Good, uniform
Rotational Molding
Less control, more variation
Attribute
Need for secondary processes
Blow Molding
Minimal, sometimes needs trimming and finishing
Rotational Molding
Moderate, typically needs trimming and finishing
Attribute
Startup costs
Blow Molding
Higher, $200,000 for lifetime
Rotational Molding
Lower, $150,000 per year
Attribute
Long-term costs
Blow Molding
Can save up to 40%, especially for high-output production of over 3,000 units a year
Rotational Molding
Higher per part for lower volumes
Attribute
Piece cost
Blow Molding
Approx. $22
Rotational Molding
Approx. $35
Attribute
Mold durability
Blow Molding
High
Rotational Molding
Low
Attribute
Compatible materials
Blow Molding
LDPE, HDPE, PP, PET, and PVC
Rotational Molding
LDPE, LLDPE, HDPE, and PEX
Attribute
Applications
Blow Molding
Bottles, containers, toys, oil tanks
Rotational Molding
Large tanks, coolers, kayaks, playground equipment

Blow Molding vs. Rotational Molding

FAQs on Blow Molding and Rotational Molding

Are there any alternatives to blow molding and rotational molding?

There are a couple of alternatives to both these molding techniques. Thermoforming is a popular option that heats a plastic sheet until it is fully pliable, then it’s shaped around a single-sided mold and left to cool. Thermoforming is similar to both blow molding and rotomolding in that all three processes involve heating the plastic. The other option gaining a lot of traction in recent years for its ease of use and affordability is vacuum forming, where a plastic sheet is heated and then pulled against the mold via suction.

What method is more affordable?

This will all boil down to how many products you need to make. While blow molding has higher initial startup costs than rotomolding, it can churn out 70 pieces an hour, and works out cheaper (around 40%) in high-volume production. For low production demands of less than 3,000 units a year, rotomolding will be more cost-effective as it has a lower initial startup cost.

How Xometry Can Help

We’ve got a bunch of molding services here at Xometry, including custom blow molding, insert molding, prototype molding, overmolding, and injection molding. You can get started today by uploading your designs to the Xometry Instant Quoting Engine®!

Disclaimer

The content appearing on this webpage is for informational purposes only. Xometry makes no representation or warranty of any kind, be it expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or validity of the information. Any performance parameters, geometric tolerances, specific design features, quality and types of materials, or processes should not be inferred to represent what will be delivered by third-party suppliers or manufacturers through Xometry’s network. Buyers seeking quotes for parts are responsible for defining the specific requirements for those parts. Please refer to our terms and conditions for more information.

picture of Kat de Naoum
Kat de Naoum
Kat de Naoum is a writer, author, editor, and content specialist from the UK with 20+ years of writing experience. Kat has experience writing for a variety of manufacturing and technical organizations and loves the world of engineering. Alongside writing, Kat was a paralegal for almost 10 years, seven of which were in ship finance. She has written for many publications, both print and online. Kat has a BA in English literature and philosophy, and an MA in creative writing from Kingston University.

Read more articles by Kat de Naoum

Quick Links

  • Home

  • Contact Us

  • Help Center

  • About Us

  • Careers

  • Press

  • Investors

  • Xometry Go Green

Support

  • Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Legal

  • ITAR | ISO 9001:2015 | AS9100D | ISO 13485:2016 | IATF 16949:2016


© 2024 Xometry, All Rights Reserved